Bonds & creditAcadian Asset Management Standout
Corporate Credit and the Institutional Portfolio: Reasserting First Principles
Private creditActive vs passive
Our summary
Public corporate bonds should anchor institutional corporate-credit allocations, while private credit and systematic active management should serve as complementary sources of diversification and alpha.
- The credit risk premium is presented as a distinct strategic return source, and Acadian's 2023 research found a Sharpe ratio comparable with equity and term premia while combinations of credit with government bonds or equities improved risk-adjusted returns.
- The global benchmark-eligible public corporate-bond universe totals roughly $17 trillion, compared with approximately $2.0 trillion to $2.5 trillion each for broadly syndicated loans and private credit.
- Public bonds offer broader diversification across issuers, credit quality, industries, and geographies, alongside standardized terms, public reporting, and observable prices. Direct lending is concentrated in smaller, mostly domestic, often private-equity-owned borrowers.
- Acadian cites evidence that less-liquid public bonds have wider spreads and higher average returns but also substantially higher volatility, while adjusting direct-lending results for an estimated 3% of fees and expenses and higher understated risk produces a Sharpe ratio broadly in line with syndicated loans and high-yield bonds.
- In a study of more than 100,000 hypothetical timing strategies across regions and sectors, nearly 70% underperformed a simple buy-and-hold allocation, and the apparent successes rarely held across markets or specifications.
Takeaway: Institutions should own the credit risk premium through a diversified public-bond core, add private credit or syndicated loans only when their incremental benefits are demonstrated, and use systematic active management to broaden alpha, control risk, and execute efficiently.
Published by Acadian Asset Management. Summary by HF Best Ideas.